From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32210 invoked by alias); 1 May 2008 19:48:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 31944 invoked by uid 22791); 1 May 2008 19:48:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 May 2008 19:48:20 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6D8983D6; Thu, 1 May 2008 19:48:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995198366; Thu, 1 May 2008 19:48:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JrelO-0007F9-Du; Thu, 01 May 2008 15:48:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 19:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] backtrace in mixed language applications (take 2) Message-ID: <20080501194818.GK22218@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20070810100313.GA29799@adacore.com> <20080109204712.GJ21281@adacore.com> <20080129180025.GH3773@caradoc.them.org> <20080204205620.GE21614@adacore.com> <20080204210336.GF21614@adacore.com> <20080424013033.GA5814@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080424013033.GA5814@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:30:33PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Since the adjustments from the previous iteration were relatively > minor, I will commit in a week unless someone objects (or approves :). > Hopefully the patch still applies cleanly - I'll retest in any case. Looks OK to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery