From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14874 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2008 14:29:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 14861 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2008 14:29:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:28 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD302982C4; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691FE98278; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:29:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jqqph-0004oy-9s; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:29:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, bauerman@br.ibm.com, amodra@bigpond.net.au Subject: Re: Shared library call problems on PowerPC with current binutils/gdb Message-ID: <20080429142925.GA18404@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, bauerman@br.ibm.com, amodra@bigpond.net.au References: <200804282253.m3SMrwQF005602@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20080429003951.GA30324@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080429003951.GA30324@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:39:51PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:53:58AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > - Extend elf_symtab_read to treat a synthetic symbol XXX@plt as a > > mst_solib_trampoline symbol for XXX. > > Sounds reasonable. I suggested this to Aleksandar for another > problem, even :-) Though it was kind of nice to have it show up in > disassembly with @plt; will it still do that? It's nice to know > immediately when I'm looking at the PLT stub instead of the > definition. Relatedly, could we change find_solib_trampoline_target instead, to allow "@plt"? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery