From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15786 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2008 20:10:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 15776 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2008 20:10:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:10:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22D4983DB; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:10:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C3E980F7; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:10:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JolI7-0003q9-Uy; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:10:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: [RFA] Keep breakpoints always inserted. Message-ID: <20080423201007.GA14383@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Vladimir Prus References: <200802281717.14766.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080417164157.GK17488@caradoc.them.org> <200804232045.55097.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804232045.55097.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00530.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:45:54PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > I've tested this patch on top of Vladimir's and with displaced > stepping on, on x86-pc-linux-gnu. Luis tested it on PPC, where > it also fixed things. OK when the original patch is committed. > P.S.: > Anyone object to adding debug output support to the > breakpoint module? I've writen something similar twice > already, and I'd like to not have to a third time. Something > like "set debug breakpoint 1", where it prints > "breakpoints inserted", "breakpoints removed", etc. Sounds like a good idea to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery