From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17855 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2008 12:58:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 17847 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2008 12:58:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:58:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69300983E4; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:58:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9959829E; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:58:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jnvax-0008G4-F2; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:58:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] ppc gdbserver: autodetect AltiVec and SPE Message-ID: <20080421125807.GA31597@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1208752523.5808.141.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200804211255.m3LCtQWp029553@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804211255.m3LCtQWp029553@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:55:26PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > I'm wondering whether it wouldn't make sense now to drop the > configure-time distinction between powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux > for gdbserver (just like there already is no such distinction > for GDB itself). Agreed. We already know that the ppc64 files compile OK with -m32, since Thiago's doing it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery