From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32107 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2008 02:13:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32099 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2008 02:13:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:13:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5DD2A97D5; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xgsm6rWO-KdT; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACE52A97D0; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16C59E7ACD; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:57:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove exec_set_section_offsets Message-ID: <20080419021241.GO12735@adacore.com> References: <1208564244.5808.95.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080419015835.GN12735@adacore.com> <1208570812.5808.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1208570812.5808.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 > Nice to know, thanks for the tip. So if I observe that, this kind of > patch fits the obvious rule? Yes :). -- Joel