From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11192 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2008 17:47:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 11183 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2008 17:47:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:46:45 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2578983D6; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:46:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FDD982C4; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:46:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JmYC2-00020U-St; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:46:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Report the original location specification for a breakpoint. Message-ID: <20080417174642.GO17488@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200804151434.57665.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080417025749.GA18352@caradoc.them.org> <200804171359.09556.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804171359.09556.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:59:08PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Beyond those, I don't see a problem with it. Though wouldn't we like > > to display this in the CLI sometimes too? > > I have no idea. I'd much rather have somebody else decide what CLI should > contain. Well, it would be nice to show if we could fit it, but I don't see where. By the way, here's where that duplicate addr= came from in GDB 6.8: if (header_of_multiple) ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", ""); if (b->loc == NULL || loc->shlib_disabled) ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", ""); else ui_out_field_core_addr (uiout, "addr", loc->address); Should that be else if? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery