From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19792 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2008 15:30:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 19778 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2008 15:30:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:29:57 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB3F983D6 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:29:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F044982C4 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:29:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JmW3e-0005UT-Tz for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:29:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] Frame unwinding using struct value Message-ID: <20080417152954.GB17488@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080331221024.GA22334@caradoc.them.org> <20080404172214.GD23283@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080404172214.GD23283@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:22:14AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > The gdb_assert should be moved up before the "if (frame_debug)" block. > Otherwise, we'll bomb while dereferencing FRAME before we trip the > assertion. (I realize that this code was already like this before) Thanks, fixed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery