From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24707 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2008 22:56:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 24697 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2008 22:56:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate5.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:56:14 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m37MuBPH158178 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:56:11 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m37MuAPN3256412 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:56:10 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m37MuA6X023198 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:56:10 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m37MuAcM023193; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:56:10 +0200 Message-Id: <200804072256.m37MuAcM023193@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:56:10 +0200 Subject: Re: [patch] dw2-ranges.S non-g GAS crash [Re: spu-as internal error] To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com (Jan Kratochvil) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:42:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: amodra@bigpond.net.au (Alan Modra), Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080407063027.GA26788@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> from "Jan Kratochvil" at Apr 07, 2008 08:30:27 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Has this testcase ever assembled? On any target? I think gas would > > always have aborted unless you pass -g to gas or supply .file > > directives. > > It was always built just inside `runtest'. > > Requesting a commit approval. Verified unpatched GDB still FAILs on it. As I just noticed, this is really also a spu-gcc problem: gcc *is* always called with -g, but spu-gcc does not pass this on to the assembler. Do you still think we should add the .file directive, or does the test case make more sense without it? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com