From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9554 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2008 19:16:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9543 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2008 19:16:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:16:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A04983BE; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:16:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEB2982C4; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:16:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JhrOT-00017l-OQ; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:16:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfa, gdbserver] Fix breakage due to XML rework Message-ID: <20080404191609.GA4304@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1207324826.19907.3.camel@gargoyle> <200804041909.m34J9opM025355@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804041909.m34J9opM025355@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:09:50PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Doh. If gdbserver always reports qXfer:features:read as supported, > it must of course also never return "unsupported" status when that > query is executed. I thought this was already the case, but I > overlooked this extra check ... Sorry. > > The following patch fixes the regressions on ppc. > OK for mainline? Yes, thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery