From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12103 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2008 15:29:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 12086 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2008 15:29:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:28:46 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B0298119; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:28:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B979802B; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:28:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JgLwB-0000Ur-9T; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:28:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Avoid error/prompt reversal for mingw Message-ID: <20080331152843.GA1576@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <000601c89342$3eb4a590$bc1df0b0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c89342$3eb4a590$bc1df0b0$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00503.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:16:50PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > I am currently trying to > run the testsuite of mingw target... > It is almost working now... We have spent a lot of time over the last few months getting the testsuite to run on mingw. A mingw-built GDB does not work well with a Cygwin expect. The flush is actually a symptom of a larger problem: isatty returns false when running in expect, but the testsuite is written as if it runs on a terminal. We've got a couple of patches. Some of them we can submit because they're only moderately ugly, but others are just horrible. Can you test a Cygwin-built GDB instead? It's a lot easier, it works a lot better, and it tests more or less the same code. I can try to separate out the postable patches later this week if you'd like. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery