From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18709 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 11:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18697 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2008 11:51:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:51:08 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8113983AA; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:51:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B654F983A1; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:51:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JeqdM-00075Z-AH; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:51:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: FAILs on x86? Message-ID: <20080327115104.GA27230@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Deuling , GDB Patches References: <47EB86DF.10803@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47EB86DF.10803@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:37:03PM +0100, Markus Deuling wrote: > Hi, > > I see lots of FAILs on x86. Anyone else seeing this? Not me. What's in gdb.log for a typical failure? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery