From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25972 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2008 11:28:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 25958 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2008 11:28:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate5.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:27:52 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2QBR5LK430276 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:27:06 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2QBR51C1913044 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:27:05 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2QBR5ub002496 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:27:05 +0100 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m2QBR5xB002491; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:27:05 +0100 Message-Id: <200803261127.m2QBR5xB002491@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:27:05 +0100 Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for PPC Altivec registers in gcore To: cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Carlos Eduardo Seo) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:28:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: schwab@suse.de (Andreas Schwab), gdb-patches@sourceware.org (GDB Patches Mailing List) In-Reply-To: <47E98097.6020704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> from "Carlos Eduardo Seo" at Mar 25, 2008 07:45:43 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00393.txt.bz2 Carlos Eduardo Seo wrote: > Exactly. GCC 4.x has more strict checks and, therefore doesn't allow > this declaration. Sorry for not including the error in my previous message. > > So, is it OK to include that header? Yes, this is OK then. Sorry for the confusion. Please make sure you also update the Makefile.in dependency rules. Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com