From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22497 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2008 00:09:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22489 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2008 00:09:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:09:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6332AA9C4 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id XCKaghWrNTdz for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BB12AA0E7 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4125BE7ACB; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] new set/show multiple-symbols command (take 4) Message-ID: <20080322000921.GF3588@adacore.com> References: <20080203070825.GK1581@adacore.com> <20080321145119.GC25307@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080321145119.GC25307@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 > > (gdb) set multiple-symbols (ask|all|cancel) > > (gdb) show multiple-symbols > > This seems OK. Thanks :). > > * gdb.cp/ovldbreak.cc: Add missing bodies for methods foo::foofunc. > > Why was this one necessary? It may be hiding a bug. IIRC, I was having trouble getting GDB to break on foofunc, and it looked like it was because the body of these functions were missing. It seemed pretty normal at the time that I wouldn't be able to break on either of these methods if there was no body... Should I looked deeper into this? -- Joel