From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1213 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2008 19:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 1204 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2008 19:27:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:27:19 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B78698149; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:27:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DB298119; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:27:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc3wR-0002s8-UV; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:27:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [linux] fix stepping over fork in follow-child mode. Message-ID: <20080319192715.GA11024@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200803182046.46420.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080318234805.GA14989@caradoc.them.org> <20080319160257.GA31587@caradoc.them.org> <20080319192237.GB3588@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080319192237.GB3588@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:22:37PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I only have one very minor question: Why is the thread exit notification > now conditional on print_thread_events? I did notice that you changed > the few printf_filtered of such events into printf_unfiltered the same > way we did for the new thread events, which is nice :). It already was for Linux - the code in linux-nat.c didn't used to trigger, and I deleted a use of print_thread_events in linux-thread-db.c. I think the AIX / procfs ones were simply an oversight. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery