From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4559 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2008 19:15:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 4551 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2008 19:15:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:15:38 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A15983C0 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:15:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D1598011 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:15:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JbKo3-0006Nf-T1 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:15:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Use compilation unit's address size in dwarf2expr.c and dwarf2loc.c Message-ID: <20080317191535.GA24506@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080315183834.35136a25@ironwood.lan> <200803171335.m2HDZ3ad032124@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803171335.m2HDZ3ad032124@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Sorry for not following up on this earlier. Me too; I see that I had the ball on the set_loc parts and I dropped it. > Does this look OK? It does to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery