From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13556 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2008 01:39:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 13548 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2008 01:39:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:38:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2G1caR1021796 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:38:36 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2G1cZ5q024163 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:38:35 -0400 Received: from ironwood.lan (vpn-14-135.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.135]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2G1cZhv028776 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:38:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:39:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Use compilation unit's address size in dwarf2expr.c and dwarf2loc.c Message-ID: <20080315183834.35136a25@ironwood.lan> In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0803151238r65ecaa77x4b01fe6e22e6df2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080314151448.649507f9@ironwood.lan> <8f2776cb0803151236l38d3bca3j625613f84df228b@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0803151238r65ecaa77x4b01fe6e22e6df2@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:38:08 -0700 "Jim Blandy" wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Didn't Uli W. update that patch already? > > I don't mean to be cryptic. I have a strong recollection of Ulrich > Weigand starting with that patch and bringing it up to date with the > current sources. I can't remember whether the conversation ended with > a commit, or stalled. Apparently it stalled. (It's certainly not in the present sources.) The patch and and subsequent thread begins here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00329.html Kevin