From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32143 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2008 17:29:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 32134 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2008 17:29:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4008C2AA1D6; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:29:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0ZgAXGCMBxMW; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:29:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0772A2AA1D4; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:29:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CD1CE7ACB; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit/branch] Version set to 6.7.90 Message-ID: <20080314172900.GK3738@adacore.com> References: <20080313175220.GB11778@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 > This is unfortunate, since 6.7.90 is smaller than 6.7.90.20080313-cvs. > It would have been better to bump the version to 6.7.91. I'm just following the guidelines that are documented at http://www.sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint_16.html#SEC129. The reason why it sounds strange is because I think the guidelines are assuming that I should be making the first pre-release off the branchpoint, so there should be no 6.7.90.something before 6.7.90. I don't mind changing the procedures to do that, or changing the numbering scheme, if it makes more sense. -- Joel