From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9442 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2008 15:11:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9137 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2008 15:11:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:11:18 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50257983B5; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:11:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C33D983AA; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:11:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JaBYx-0005TV-I9; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:11:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Implement -thread-info. Message-ID: <20080314151115.GB19288@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200802171833.26673.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200802181038.04497.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <18361.64577.771676.184618@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200802201427.36288.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080314150732.GA19288@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314150732.GA19288@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:07:32AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I have realized that while the patch is mostly about MI, it also > > touches generic code -- thread.c. Is that part of patch (attached again > > for convenience) OK? Oh, one other thing. I went back to look at Denis's patches. He made -thread-info without an argument describe the current thread only. Doesn't that seem useful, especially before we get notifications completely hammered out? I do not see any other MI command that reports the current thread. So that would mean we needed -thread-list-all-threads back again. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery