From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1855 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2008 23:14:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 1844 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2008 23:14:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:14:29 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D94983B5 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:14:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDFE9801D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:14:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JYrCM-0002Y3-Hn for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:14:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Allow a wrapper when starting programs Message-ID: <20080310231426.GA9395@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080208185727.GA30185@caradoc.them.org> <20080209154834.GA32141@caradoc.them.org> <20080209165328.GA3161@caradoc.them.org> <20080211161418.GA11830@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:29:52PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:14:18 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > Could you take a look at this version? I've made the descriptions > > more user-centric and I hope they're clearer now. > > Yes, this is much, much better; thanks. Thanks for your help. Belatedly, checked in. > I think "any Unix shell script" is more accurate. (with this change) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery