From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1582 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2008 14:07:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 1435 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Mar 2008 14:07:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:06:40 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F4B983AC for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:06:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015A198119 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:06:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JWBJL-0002tH-Gh for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:06:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:07:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Allow watchpoints on inaccessible memory Message-ID: <20080303140633.GA16167@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070821142500.GA28295@caradoc.them.org> <20080228161749.GA31695@caradoc.them.org> <20080302042432.GA5486@caradoc.them.org> <20080302232302.GA3207@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:26:38AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:23:02 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > And therein lies the problem, no? > > > > Do you think it is a problem? I think they're pretty much normal watchpoints. > > I disagree, but maybe I'm the only one, and the issue is minor anyway. OK. For now, I've checked in the patch; if you'd like, you're welcome follow up with any changes. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery