From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-54364-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26226 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2008 15:17:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 26216 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2008 15:17:10 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (HELO host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net) (89.250.240.59)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:16:37 +0000
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m22FGPYA029915; 	Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:16:25 +0100
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) 	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m22FGOUY029914; 	Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:16:24 +0100
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:17:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix segfault on a failed watchpoint update
Message-ID: <20080302151624.GA29905@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20080302084050.GA22521@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080302150849.GA10992@caradoc.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080302150849.GA10992@caradoc.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:08:49 +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:40:50AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > currently GDB HEAD segfaults during one case for the PIE inferiors (failing as
> > it is the unpatched CVS HEAD), segfault fix attached.
> 
> Thanks, I can see what's wrong.  I'm about to commit another patch
> which should fix this (just waiting for doc review, so probably
> Monday).  Could you let me know if this fixes it?
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-02/msg00472.html

Yes, this patch also fixes the segfault.


Thanks,
Jan