From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21096 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2008 17:03:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 21087 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2008 17:03:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:02:52 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4049C983A1; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:02:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5CD98140; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:02:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JUm9i-0000WF-DB; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:02:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] ppc gdbserver: autodetect AltiVec and SPE Message-ID: <20080228170250.GA1978@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080228135240.GA8988@caradoc.them.org> <200802281657.m1SGv67A001187@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802281657.m1SGv67A001187@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:57:06PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > What you do think about this patch? It looks great to me. It may be a little while before I can test it, though. Thanks again for working on this! > - As the regmap was defined only for 32-bit host machines, I've > disabled SPE support on 64-bit hosts. I don't think there are > any 64-bit machines with SPE anyway, right? That's right. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery