From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22679 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2008 14:18:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 22671 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2008 14:18:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:18:36 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1AD983A1; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:18:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D6F98140; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:18:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JUjak-000345-2m; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:18:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Vladimir Prus , Greg Law , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SIGSEGV on gdb 6.7* Message-ID: <20080228141834.GC8988@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , Vladimir Prus , Greg Law , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <1204066487.19253.346.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080227002617.GA19479@caradoc.them.org> <1204072653.19253.371.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080227004305.GA29652@caradoc.them.org> <1204073493.19253.382.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080227005415.GA25935@caradoc.them.org> <1204074335.19253.390.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47C5C684.8010404@undo-software.com> <1204207961.18153.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1204207961.18153.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:12:41AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:15 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > This patch cause testsuite regressions for me, as follows: > > > > FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: continue to printf > > FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: send SIGUSR1 > > FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: signal sent > > In my experience, this testcase is "nondeterministic", meaning that it > will go back and forth between PASS and FAIL for no good reason. The whole testcase is not; there's a few particular subtests that are, which involve SIGINT. We've never managed to reproduce that one outside of expect, unfortunately. > Is it useful to have such list on the wiki? Sure, but with attached example logs might be best so that we can remove them when they're fixed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery