From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1235 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2008 20:32:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 1224 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2008 20:32:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:31:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E432AA1B4 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i+IdiClpsdXf for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C7D2A9D29 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:31:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51250E7ACB; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:31:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080227203145.GC3701@adacore.com> References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> <20080131220814.GB6326@caradoc.them.org> <20080202011945.GA13812@adacore.com> <20080227194715.GA12434@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080227194715.GA12434@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 > > As I said yesterday, the idea eventually got accepted by everyone. > > Here is the patch again, together with the associated adjustments > > to the testsuite. > > As no one has disagreed with your interpretation :-), this is OK. Great (Yay! :-). Patch now checked in. Thanks! -- Joel