From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6036 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2008 19:47:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 6021 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2008 19:47:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:47:20 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C819398140; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:47:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6349811F; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:47:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JUSFH-0003Pp-Kk; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:47:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080227194715.GA12434@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> <20080131220814.GB6326@caradoc.them.org> <20080202011945.GA13812@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080202011945.GA13812@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:19:45PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > As I said yesterday, the idea eventually got accepted by everyone. > Here is the patch again, together with the associated adjustments > to the testsuite. As no one has disagreed with your interpretation :-), this is OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery