From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18090 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2008 13:20:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 18082 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2008 13:20:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:20:27 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6866398140; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:20:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535A29811F; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:20:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JUMCu-0005vv-GQ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:20:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/args.exp avoid duplicate output Message-ID: <20080227132024.GD21538@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <000601c8793c$05388d10$0fa9a730$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c8793c$05388d10$0fa9a730$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:26:47PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: > OK to apply? Yes, thanks. > I found several other tests that have duplicate outputs, > are those kind of changes covered by the obvious rule? I think so. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery