From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8132 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2008 03:57:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8123 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Feb 2008 03:57:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:57:37 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FA998118; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:57:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509E69801D; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:57:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JTqwh-0003VC-Bg; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:57:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc][3/3] gdbserver bi-arch support: fix s390x partial register access Message-ID: <20080226035735.GF4456@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080129202746.GB15063@caradoc.them.org> <200801292335.m0TNZHFg021515@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801292335.m0TNZHFg021515@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:35:17AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > What do you think about passing data to the low target in this case? > > For MIPS the right bits will be value-dependent - registers must be > > sign extended. > > Hmm, what about the version below? This should allow the low target > whatever flexibility it requires ... Looks good to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery