From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21603 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2008 20:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 21593 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2008 20:22:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:22:14 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F83498213 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:22:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A39B98140 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:22:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ74V-0007x1-L3 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:22:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc]: Replace current_gdbarch in hppa Message-ID: <20080215202211.GA30385@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200802151838.m1FIcnFC028614@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200802152019.45868.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802152019.45868.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:19:45PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Can any user input lead to such a stray regno? Or are all > those off accesses really GDB bugs? If so, why not make > it a gdb_assert or internal_error? It's always a GDB bug. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery