From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6989 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2008 21:43:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 6980 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2008 21:43:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:42:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68C32A9BD2; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:42:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tTK8A0NfNpkF; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:42:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BBC2A9BD1; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:42:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C313E7ACB; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:42:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Nick Roberts Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: (gdb-6.8) Discard breakpoint address if shared library is unloaded Message-ID: <20080214214246.GC3713@adacore.com> References: <20080204214226.GF20922@adacore.com> <20080207063817.GA3907@adacore.com> <18347.45621.630420.453287@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200802080942.29622.ghost@cs.msu.su> <18348.1691.478013.310214@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18348.1691.478013.310214@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 Nick, > > Since you seem to have a patch relative to previous one, would you mind > > sending a complete patch relative to CVS HEAD? > > Joel's version is relative to CVS HEAD. All I'm suggesting is that also > requires that the line Can you please resend a new complete patch, with a ChangeLog, and I will review it. It's much easier that way for me to make sure that what I think you are proposing is indeed what you are proposing to commit. Thanks, -- Joel