From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28125 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2008 13:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 28116 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2008 13:27:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:27:24 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABE798118; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:27:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6902E9801D; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:27:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JOYgq-0002Sc-Uz; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:27:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: Access to arrays in fortran buggy Message-ID: <20080211132720.GA9342@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Deuling , GDB Patches References: <47B040C7.8080101@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47B040C7.8080101@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:34:15PM +0100, Markus Deuling wrote: > For my opinion Fortran should have its own evaluation routine for > those expressions which access arrays. If the type is not an array > Fortran could fall back to the standard routines. No, this is supposed to be handled by the lower bound field in struct type. The test passes for me - I suspect your compiler is not emitting correct debug info. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery