Re: [patch] make --disable-gdbmi work

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-01T19:19:53Z

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:06:11PM -0500, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> Yes, Vladimir correctly pointed out - my argument about reducing the code
> size is not really a good one...
>
> I still think the patch is useful, if for no other reason, to keep
> dependencies single directional (mi -> gdb).

That's the part I don't think is useful. The dependencies shouldn't
be single-directional; I don't see why we should keep MI out of the
rest of GDB.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery