From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30856 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2008 19:19:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 30847 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2008 19:19:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:19:29 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C261998218; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:19:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A587998217; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:19:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JL1Q6-0003fG-IQ; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:19:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Aleksandar Ristovski Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] make --disable-gdbmi work Message-ID: <20080201191926.GA13787@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aleksandar Ristovski , Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <47A23493.5000508@qnx.com> <20080131205719.GA1887@caradoc.them.org> <47A2371C.3020402@qnx.com> <47A36DA3.2080804@qnx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47A36DA3.2080804@qnx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:06:11PM -0500, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > Yes, Vladimir correctly pointed out - my argument about reducing the code > size is not really a good one... > > I still think the patch is useful, if for no other reason, to keep > dependencies single directional (mi -> gdb). That's the part I don't think is useful. The dependencies shouldn't be single-directional; I don't see why we should keep MI out of the rest of GDB. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery