On Friday 01 February 2008 17:24:39 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:53:46AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > So, why bother trying to make gdb_breakpoint non-throwing? I believe
> > any such change will be at least as complex as making mi_cmd_break_insert
> > exception-safe? If your concern is about gdb_ prefix, how about renaming
> > gdb_exception into 'set_breakpoint'?
> 
> That's fine too.

What about the following, then?

- Volodya