From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2008 22:08:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 19347 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jan 2008 22:08:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:08:16 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5CE98217 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:08:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E6698214 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:08:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JKhZu-0001f4-HX for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:08:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080131220814.GB6326@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00876.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:17:45AM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > 2008-01-09 Joel Brobecker > > * breakpoint.c (skip_prologue_sal): New function. > (resolve_sal_pc): Adjust SAL past prologue if the SAL was > computed from a line number. I tried to reread the thread below this patch, but eventually got lost. What was the verdict? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery