From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-53790-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15502 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 19:06:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 15493 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2008 19:06:08 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:05:46 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0UJ5cND030920; 	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:05:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0UJ5cLr001473; 	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:05:38 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:25:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200801301905.m0UJ5cLr001473@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20080130184424.GA28989@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:44:24 -0500)
Subject: Re: [RFA/doc] Mention fork/exec catchpoints for GNU/Linux
References: <20080129225353.GB21147@caradoc.them.org> <200801301837.m0UIbiou023241@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080130184424.GA28989@caradoc.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00822.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:44:24 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Hey, catch fork/vfork is supported on OpenBSD too!  I'll submit a
> > follow-on diff once Daniel's gets committed ;).
> 
> Are you sure catch vfork works?  Nothing in inf-ptrace.c generates
> TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED - looks like I searched for that instead of
> ..._FORKED.

Heh, it doesn't.  I rmember now that the vfork semantics made things a
little bit difficult, and that I didn't add support for it in the
kernel.