From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3148 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 18:38:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 3114 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2008 18:38:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:38:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808732A97AA for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id W0+cDRVbhX2Y for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0F22A9782 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44F6AE7ACB; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:38:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: generic code duplication in Ada files Message-ID: <20080130183809.GA12387@adacore.com> References: <20080129223342.GH16288@adacore.com> <20080129224123.GA6586@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080129224123.GA6586@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00817.txt.bz2 > This is exactly what I was hoping for. The duplication has been > status quo for many years; I don't mind it continuing that way, and > once we're in sync you'll have the option of doing restructuring on > the FSF tree, getting it right, and then importing it into your local > sources - much more palatable. I'm really glad to see that we have the same ideas on how to move forward. That's great! I'll go ahead and check in the patches that you already approved. -- Joel