From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10087 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2008 23:17:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10073 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2008 23:17:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:16:48 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF3298151; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582D09811F; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JJzh7-0005yI-6Q; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:16:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [BUG:MI] -break-list doesn't list multiple breakpoints Message-ID: <20080129231645.GC21147@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <18310.38708.144719.374963@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18311.57557.312425.107700@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080111225452.GA26085@caradoc.them.org> <18314.33230.101539.472963@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080129185942.GA9019@caradoc.them.org> <18335.44497.199685.970311@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18335.44497.199685.970311@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00741.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:50:57AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > It's a backwards incompatible change but do other frontends use it? Yes; I checked Eclipse before I wrote back. > As an alternative, I guess this line alone could be removed so that > -break-insert lists the multiple breakpoint locations being set and the > adjust MI documentation to explain this. We should check what the new MI output looks like, and see if it breaks Emacs / Eclipse / Kdevelop. It might be that easy. > In any case, I think deprecated_set_gdb_event_hooks should go. In CLI, > breakpoint details are printed in mention with say_where=1. I don't really > understand why things need to differently for MI or why it can't be done > here too. I don't know how any of this bit works :-( -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery