From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26840 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2008 21:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 26831 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2008 21:54:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:54:09 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600ED98151 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:54:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A439811F for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:54:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JJyP9-0005Rq-Bi for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:54:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Support exec tracing on GNU/Linux and HP-UX Message-ID: <20080129215407.GH15063@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20071022043831.GD764@adacore.com> <20071022114328.GA1421@caradoc.them.org> <20071022184702.GG764@adacore.com> <20071022185627.GH764@adacore.com> <20071022193024.GA16312@caradoc.them.org> <20071221153039.GO6154@adacore.com> <20080129170835.GC2815@caradoc.them.org> <20080129211657.GC16288@adacore.com> <20080129214530.GE15063@caradoc.them.org> <20080129214806.GG16288@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080129214806.GG16288@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:48:06PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > Do you want to push your patch for the 6.8 release or would you > > > rather wait for the next one? > > > > I've no preference; may as well commit it, unless you think I should > > wait until the start of the release cycle. > > I don't see why we would need to wait unless you didn't have the time. I've reviewed two dozen other patches today, I can make time for my own :-) I hope. Anyway, thanks. I will commit it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery