From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22989 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2008 21:48:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 22980 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2008 21:48:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:48:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E8E2A9620 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:48:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cAOzTeoeutVz for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:48:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CB22A9617 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:48:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9EF5E7ACB; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:48:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Support exec tracing on GNU/Linux and HP-UX Message-ID: <20080129214806.GG16288@adacore.com> References: <20071019175920.GA548@caradoc.them.org> <20071022043831.GD764@adacore.com> <20071022114328.GA1421@caradoc.them.org> <20071022184702.GG764@adacore.com> <20071022185627.GH764@adacore.com> <20071022193024.GA16312@caradoc.them.org> <20071221153039.GO6154@adacore.com> <20080129170835.GC2815@caradoc.them.org> <20080129211657.GC16288@adacore.com> <20080129214530.GE15063@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080129214530.GE15063@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00731.txt.bz2 > > Do you want to push your patch for the 6.8 release or would you > > rather wait for the next one? > > I've no preference; may as well commit it, unless you think I should > wait until the start of the release cycle. I don't see why we would need to wait unless you didn't have the time. -- Joel