From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7230 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2008 16:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 7209 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2008 16:50:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:50:08 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125E098234; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:50:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF52F9811F; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:50:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JJtev-0000XD-Px; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:50:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Lerele Subject: Re: [gdbserver/win32] (5/11) New interrupting method : elevating the priority Message-ID: <20080129165005.GB1637@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Lerele References: <4737B563.4070909@portugalmail.pt> <20071201185809.GD24231@caradoc.them.org> <47536DE2.7040802@portugalmail.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47536DE2.7040802@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:45:54AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Thank you. > > I've checked the whole series in, except for this one and the next (6). > > Leo, could you take a look at the attached patch? It's a > refresh against current cvs, with a minor tweak to minimize a > race in the previous version -- we were creating the threads > but not waiting for them to start. No one's responded to this, and it's been quite a while - at this point, I think it's OK to commit. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery