From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2008 02:50:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 19351 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2008 02:50:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:50:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4662A967C; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id X9JW1ZoLOXQs; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE16A2A9630; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C7A86E7ACB; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:50:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] document "set/show multiple-choice-auto-select" Message-ID: <20080125025017.GG3979@adacore.com> References: <20080124213256.GA5796@adacore.com> <18329.4090.323528.699595@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18329.4090.323528.699595@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00600.txt.bz2 > > I usually say that I'll send a doco update after a patch is accepted, > > but in this case, for once I'm sending the doco patch before I started > > working on the patch itself :). The patch will follow soon, but the > > general principal behind the change is accepted I think, so it's safe > > to work on the documentation a bit in advance. > > I would guess that your proposed patch will overlap with one that I've > recently submitted: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00421.html I'm sorry - I am still jetlaged from my 36h trip and 12h time difference, so I may be even more obtuse than usual ;-). IIUC, you are trying to improve the situation in MI regarding multiple-location breakpoints, right? Where is the overlapping? In the fact that you'll have to modify the documentation in the same area? You'll have to forgive me, I don't know the MI protocol apart from the general principles behind it. This may also explain my questions... -- Joel