From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20923 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2008 06:30:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 20874 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2008 06:30:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:27:36 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v53so139651pyh.33 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.49.4 with SMTP id b4mr339352pyk.35.1201156053629; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:27:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0801232227n64502d4akef4642b051e77772@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:30:00 -0000 From: "Jim Blandy" To: "Pedro Alves" Subject: Re: arm_addr_bits_remove Cc: gdb-patches In-Reply-To: <479819E2.1030603@portugalmail.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47965D31.3040602@codesourcery.com> <8f2776cb0801221525w1d26661dgf6452f876197a591@mail.gmail.com> <479752C8.8030201@portugalmail.pt> <8f2776cb0801231121r3fe9aea0q6f3c3d6887fcb251@mail.gmail.com> <20080123192842.GA22477@caradoc.them.org> <8f2776cb0801231311o19c31781h8a4663c405bcd22b@mail.gmail.com> <479819E2.1030603@portugalmail.pt> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1e8089a6f72847a7 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00578.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20080124063000.n4DRikONRj5kp1OSzY59p6vKmigmFZA_QIPUnG9bz2w@z> On Jan 23, 2008 8:53 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Would a patch removing this be more acceptable then? I'd certainly be more enthusiastic about it. :)