From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25962 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2008 18:37:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 25954 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2008 18:37:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:37:32 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A0298375; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:37:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C01798022; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:37:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JH1WT-0007OF-5I; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:37:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Ignore breakpoints when reading memory. Message-ID: <20080121183729.GA28092@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200712011419.45773.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20071204192201.GA24515@caradoc.them.org> <8f2776cb0801210920r1ea9a0f7he8c78298787b9422@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:24:12PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > So, is it OK to commit? No, please see the questions from my mail upthread - it's clear that there is at least one user that wants to check if the breakpoint is still inserted so we need a way to do that. And read_memory_nobpt shouldn't hang around duplicating this work. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery