From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] new set/show multiple-choice-auto-select commands (take 2)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080117123044.GE28020@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478F3E4B.6050005@de.ibm.com>
> 1. set multiple-choice-auto-select off (default):
> If there is 0 || 1 symbol found, GDB follows the "normal" code path. If >
> 1 symbol is found
> the user choice is invoked
>
> 2. set multiple-choice-auto-select all:
> If there is > 1 symbol found all symbols found are automagically taken
> for e.g. breakpoints.
>
> 3. set multiple-choice-auto-select cancel:
> I think I'll ignore this. It makes no sense in that case.
>
> What do you think about it? Does it make sense?
So far, so good. But:
> The problem I saw and still see is the change of the default behaviour
> of GDB (and with that maybe the introduction of a lot of FAILs in the
> teststuite). The user has no possibility to avoid the user choice if
> there are > 1 symbols.
Right - that's the hole with using this setting. Thanks to your
explanations, I think that one way to cover that hole would be to
add an extra option like you suggested, and call it something like:
within-shared-library or somesuch. I think it's more informative
and also fits better in the concept introduced by the new "set/show"
command. In that case, the default can be set "within-shared-library"
and your current behavior would be preserved without change the
default behavior in Ada.
I need to look at how your feature is implemented. I wonder how well
this is supported when the language is Ada... As a first step, Ada
can treat this option as "off" (display menu and ask user).
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-17 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-16 13:56 Joel Brobecker
2008-01-17 6:37 ` Markus Deuling
2008-01-17 10:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-17 11:41 ` Markus Deuling
2008-01-17 12:31 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-01-17 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-17 14:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-17 15:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-23 15:33 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080117123044.GE28020@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=deuling@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox