From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-53405-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2225 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2008 11:58:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 2132 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2008 11:58:54 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:58:35 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82C82A9651; 	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:58:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with LMTP id FVM8Poeo4vOp; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:58:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645612A964F; 	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:58:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) 	id 18070E7ACB; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:58:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Handle BINOP_INTDIV in valarith.c
Message-ID: <20080117115741.GC28020@adacore.com>
References: <002d01c85849$ef420f80$cdc62e80$@u-strasbg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <002d01c85849$ef420f80$cdc62e80$@u-strasbg.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2

For the record, I asked myself about the reason for using both BINOP_DIV
and BINOP_INTDIV if both have the same semantics. I looked at some
Pascal web sites, and the only difference between the '/' operator
and the 'div' operator is the fact that '/' returns a real whereas
"div" only operates on integers an returns an integer. So the distinction
is indeed necessary.

> 2008-01-16  Pierre Muller  <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> 
> 	* valarith.c (value_binop): Handle BINOP_INTDIV
> 	for unsigned and signed integers.

This patch is approved.

-- 
Joel