From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-53333-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24967 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2008 20:48:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 24953 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2008 20:48:30 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:48:07 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0FKm0BY004609; 	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:48:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0FKm0rU027986; 	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:48:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:48:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200801152048.m0FKm0rU027986@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: bauerman@br.ibm.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <1200429235.20287.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from 	Thiago Jung Bauermann on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:54 -0200)
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix float argument passing in inferior function calls 	for ppc64
References: <1200400434.3158.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> 	 <200801151443.m0FEhxN3021953@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> 	 <1200418789.3158.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1200429235.20287.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2

> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:54 -0200
> 
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:39 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > Is the first word used for anything in the new ABI?  If not, you could
> > > support both ABIs by copying the value into both the first and the
> > > second word.
> > 
> > Great idea. I will resend the patch using that approach then.
> 
> What about this patch?

Looks fine to me, but I have no means to test it.