From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29123 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2008 12:39:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 29113 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2008 12:39:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:38:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7A12A9657; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:38:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KT7FjxCFUPZo; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:38:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0512A965A; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:38:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3D3EE7ACB; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:38:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder , Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080115123832.GL9143@adacore.com> References: <200801102208.m0AM8aDR023344@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111053547.GB12954@adacore.com> <200801111126.m0BBQQDB006618@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com> <200801112113.m0BLDnAF024595@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801121531.m0CFVW8I023504@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1200350979.3263.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080115122934.GA7873@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080115122934.GA7873@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2 > By the way, has anyone tried *FILENAME:FUNCTION? I'm surprised that > works, since it would have to be part of the C parser. Confirmed - it doesn't work. -- Joel