From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25855 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2008 12:29:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 25843 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2008 12:29:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:29:39 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255299833F; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:29:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB719811B; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:29:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JEkv8-0004XZ-6K; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:29:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080115122934.GA7873@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1200001622.14654.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801102208.m0AM8aDR023344@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111053547.GB12954@adacore.com> <200801111126.m0BBQQDB006618@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com> <200801112113.m0BLDnAF024595@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801121531.m0CFVW8I023504@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1200350979.3263.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200350979.3263.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:49:39PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > . *FILENAME:FUNCTION > > > . *EXPRESSION > > > > *FUNCTION and *FILENAME:FUNCTION are just special cases of *EXPRESSION > > But important extensions, as they are not part of the target language. By the way, has anyone tried *FILENAME:FUNCTION? I'm surprised that works, since it would have to be part of the C parser. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery