From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19996 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2008 03:57:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19986 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2008 03:57:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:56:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17A42A9664; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:56:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ljlbbgoAb7Io; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:56:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120EA2A9662; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:56:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C328E7ACB; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:56:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:57:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: Eli Zaretskii , mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080115035648.GJ9143@adacore.com> References: <200801121531.m0CFVW8I023504@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801121618.m0CGI27U012957@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080112175817.GA21954@caradoc.them.org> <20080113062450.GG9143@adacore.com> <20080113103612.GH9143@adacore.com> <1200351752.3263.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200351752.3263.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 Hi Michael, > Joel, if my memory is correct, this is because the "*" is not > interpreted by the language parser, it is interpreted by the > linespec parser. Right. In my mind, the issue was not with the "*", but in determining for each language if the expression "FUNCTION_NAME" returned the function address or not. It looks like it is the case for most languages supported by GDB. The only exceptions apparently are Ada and SCM. -- Joel