From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Wrong documentation for "&&var"?
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080112083739.GB9143@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u1w8orryj.fsf@gnu.org>
> > So Eli, do you agree with the documentation change?
>
> Reluctantly, yes. I think the &(&foo) syntax is really ugly.
I agree it would have been nice to be able to use &&foo, but
if it makes the grammar ambiguous... Anyway, the documentation
change is now in.
Thanks Eli.
--
Joel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-12 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 6:55 Joel Brobecker
2008-01-08 20:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-08 20:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-11 19:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-11 21:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-12 8:38 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080112083739.GB9143@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox